Modern Gene Sequencing Reveals Horrific Vaccine Ingredients
The federal government and many states began heavily pushing mandatory vaccines for all children in the US in 2019, after a flood of Central American vagrants began carrying Medieval diseases back into America for the first time in decades.
Every government pushing mandatory vaccines is, of course, willfully ignorant of the safety concerns that parents raise about vaccines. A new genomic study, just published by a vaccine safety group in Italy, is being totally ignored by the mainstream media as part of that willful ignorance. But the results are well worth knowing.
The Italian group that carried out the research is Corvelva. It’s an advocacy group that argues that vaccines are not as safe as world governments and Big Pharma would like us to believe.
With that bias in mind, it’s important to note that no scientific team has accomplished what Corvelva has done. The group conducted a complete genomic mapping of GlaxoSmithKline’s Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella (chickenpox) vaccine, which is usually shortened to the simpler-to-pronounce MMRV vaccination.
Corvelva mapped the vaccine using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). NGS mapping allows a level of specificity and detail that couldn’t even have been imagined in the 1970s, when the World Health Organization published its safety guidelines for vaccines. Those guidelines, by the way, are virtually unchanged after more than 40 years.
Here are the results of Corvelva’s gene mapping experiment on the MMRV vaccine:
It’s an Aborted Baby Boy.
The fetal cell line in the vaccine appears to be more than 50 years old, which is consistent with GlaxoSmithKline’s declaration that the line began in the 1960s. Not only is it from an aborted baby boy, but Corvelvo was able to map the boy’s entire DNA sequence. All the chromosomes of the aborted baby boy are present in the MMRV vaccine.
This reason alone is why mandatory vaccines are a non-starter for most pro-life Protestants and Catholics in America, as well as people of other faiths. Many of the vaccines forced on families are constructed from the replicated cells of aborted babies. There’s just no getting around that.
So long as governments continue trying to force parents to inject aborted baby parts into their own babies, a certain percentage of the population is going to resist. Abortion is unacceptable in any circumstance for real Christians, no matter how many Bible verses Pete Buttigieg twists into a pretzel knot to claim otherwise.
The Aborted Baby Boy Probably Would Have Had Cancer.
Corvelva states that the genomic DNA from the aborted baby boy was “undoubtedly abnormal,” meaning extremely unhealthy. The group identified 560 known cancer-causing gene combinations, and reports that those genes had also undergone significant modifications.
Medical science only identified the first cancer-associated gene in the 1970s, several years after the MMR vaccine first came into widespread use. And again, the safety guidelines from the WHO on vaccines were written in the 1960s, prior to that first discovery.
For the WHO to continue to claim that there is no link between vaccines and incidence of cancer is preposterous, because there have been no studies to date to establish this.
Does being vaccinated with the MMRV mean you have a greater likelihood of developing cancer in your lifetime? We simply don’t know the answer to that – and the globalist WHO and Big Pharma have no curiosity to explore the question meaningfully.
We do know that the incidence of cancer continued to rise from 1975 (the first year we started recording them) until 1991.
Cancer rates finally fell in the 1990s, but only after the government spent the 1980s warning everyone about the carcinogenic properties of cigarette smoking. It would be interesting to see what cancer rates looked like both before and after the introduction of the MMRV into the population, but the data is simply unavailable.
I’ll leave the final word to Corvelva:
“The DNA contained in these vaccines is potentially TUMORIGENIC and that the guidelines to which the supervisory bodies are appealing are NOT ADEQUATE. Moreover, we are publicly denouncing a SERIOUS OMISSION in taking those PRECAUTIONAL measures which, on the other hand, are urgently requested for antacid drugs.”